Linux Bug Compromises Tor Users...

This board has several secure submission options, check out the members message area for additional information. Unlike our old site at Yahoo, members can post messages and express their opinions in clear text.

You can also follow us on TWITTER at http://twitter.com/PGPBOARD/

For secure anon posts here: https://privacybox.de/cgi-bin/tram_msg.pl?sus=pgpboard

SSL tunnel to this board here: https://eta.securesslhost.net/~pgpboar/

or via TOR hidden service

http://c4wcxidkfhvmzhw6.onion/pgpboard.msg

or via I2P

http://privacybox.i2p/pgpboard.msg

YOU CAN CONTACT US ON SKYPE: Calling address is PGPBOARD

YOU CAN CONTACT US BY PHONE: (+44) 759 649 2035

We recommend JonDonym anonymity software package to contact us anonymously: remember to set your browser software proxy settings to 127.0.0.1:4001

PGPBOARD is one of the most secure bulletin board available. However, please remember, if the state and the NSA commit their resources against you, then nothing can be considered secure.

Stay Safe..

Alan Taylor
PGPBOARD Administrator
London, England

Linux Bug Compromises Tor Users...

Postby altaylor » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:01 am

Linux Bug Compromises Tor Users
By: Anon

Image
Note* Anon exposes concerns about the security of Tor, and points us towards email exchanges concerning a Linux bug which log things like domain names to a file in the root of the browser bundle." This will effectively provide a road map of the sites the unsuspecting Tor user
has visited..




####################################################################
Tor Browser Bundle for Linux (2.2.35-8) "EVIL bug"
*** NEVER FORGET ***
####################################################################
- http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2012/Mar/85
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/ ... 0/threaded
####################################################################
"There is an EVIL bug in at least the Linux (2.2.35-8) Tor Browser Bundle start-tor-browser script. It will log things
like domain names to a file in the root of the browser bundle."

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5417

Ticket #5417 (new defect)

RelativeLink.sh in Tor browser bundle has small typo causing debug mode to be always turned on

Reported by: cypherpunks
Priority: critical
Component: Tor bundles/installation

Description

TBB starts in debug mode disregardless of --debug switch used or not. This is caused by small bug on line 208 on
RelativeLink.sh, where it says

if [ "${debug}" ];

where it should say

if [ "${debug}" == 1];

or

if [ ${debug} -eq 1 ];

####################################################################
Thank you for the warning. I expected something like this to happen, given the last slip up with a mistake in FF versions. This, "error", if you wish to call it such, shouldn't have happened. Again, this is a lack of testing.

I hope no one in Iran, China, or other freedom starved regions were screwed because of this.

I hope a fix is released and quickly.

These mistakes should be posted in the Tor announcements mailing list (no announcements at all since Dec/11 is pathetic) and on the blog.

It would help Tor users even more if you were to actually create web forums for discussions (but I doubt you will, we've only been asking for this for years!) where you could sticky-pin these types of mistakes and communicate better with the broad range of users.

A large number of people will never use a bug tracker, and/or never use mailing lists. They are simpler minded people or too busy, this is where web based discussion forums come in. Users should not have to scramble to unofficial .onion forums which are up one day and down the next and which may (and have in the past!) contain malicious posts/threads to target the user's browser and/or Tor itself.

With errors like this, perhaps you should let Mickey Mouse sign the future Linux release bundles with his fictional GPG key. He couldn't do any worse.

I've also noticed FF crashing more often since the last few releases.

I guess it's time for us Linux bundle users to run W.I.N.E. and the Windows version of the bundle on Linux so we know we are not getting borked with some new fantastic bug or lack of oversight like this again.

But will this post be approved for others to see, or swept under the rug like one previous post about a similar issue.

Now I'm looking forward to the next release, not for use, but just to see what type of bug(s) it may contain. THANKS!

####################################################################
Nick Mathewson
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:40:43 -0700

It seems that a fix was merged yesterday: see
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5417 and
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 41036.html
.

I bet there will be new TBBs out very soon.

In the meantime, Linux users should delete vidalia-debug-log and
symlink it to /dev/null. (Haven't tested that, but it should work:

% ln -sf /dev/null /path/to/vidalia-debug-log
% ls -l /path/to/vidalia-debug-log

lrwxr-xr-x 1 username username 9 Mar 19 11:53 vidalia-debug-log
-> /dev/null
.)

IMO, this is a really good reason for us to move to getting enough
automation done so we can have nightly TBB builds and catch this kind
of thing *before* actual releases come out.

-- Nick #################################################################### Sebastian Hahn Tue, 20 Mar 2012 02:20:08 -0700 The bug in TBB is quite severe, and it is against its stated goals and design principles (one of which is leaving no/as little traces as possible on disk for later forensics). This bug was severe, it was fixed quickly, and hopefully nobody was impacted too much. Time to move on. #################################################################### Read and archive these also (to record history for this "EVIL bug": https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 40941.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 40942.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 40939.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 40945.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 40950.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 40952.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 40953.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 41036.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 41037.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 41038.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 41039.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 41040.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 41043.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/ ... 41056.html #################################################################### History won't recall this bug and the severity of it unless you archive this information and the information at the links issued above.


eof


Alan Taylor
PGPBOARD Administrator
London, England
altaylor
Site Admin
 
Posts: 653
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:38 pm

Return to MEMBERS MESSAGE AREA

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron